TM1 Forum

As promised, reporting back. Using a usedrange.value = usedrange.value approach has given me a fast enough zap to work with this model. It's still not as quick as I'd expect (given the size of the model but that kind of fits in with my idea that Excel was trying to redraw all the graphs in the middl...

Thanks, that's an idea I hadn't thought about. Given the relatively small numbers of TM1 formulae I was stuck on optimising zapping them. I did have one other "alternate" idea - I put the entire report up on TM1 Web and took a snapshot from there. That gave very fast performance and was going to be ...

Has anyone experienced certain models that work much slower to "zap" than others? We've got an add-in with home-grown VBA code that removes all the TM1 formulae in a model. In terms of logic and flow it's actually very similar to the previous ones shared here. It works fine on nearly all of our mode...

It's not just you. Our PCs are built by our IT folks and so allegedly have a standard image / build. We've got users who can use TM1 Web in Chrome, we've got some who can log in but who can't do make any of the drop-downs and we've got users who get the splash screen promptly followed by an error m...

Hi, we do not see this behaviour on 10.2.2 FP5 on Excel 2016 in our environment. Would be a royal pain as we use it this way a lot.

It's not just you. Our PCs are built by our IT folks and so allegedly have a standard image / build. We've got users who can use TM1 Web in Chrome, we've got some who can log in but who can't do make any of the drop-downs and we've got users who get the splash screen promptly followed by an error me...

Thank you Paul, my searching hadn't turned that one up - my bad.

Hi all I know this has come up a number of times so I've done the usual stuff (set ClientVersionMinimum and Support older TLS client setting) but has anyone got this combination working ... We're trying to get older clients (10.2.2 FP5) working with a newer server (Planning Analytics 2.0.4). The rea...

If it's not a formatting problem then I wonder if it's http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI91427&myns=swgimgmt&mynp=OCSS9RXT&mync=R&cm_sp=swgimgmt-_-OCSS9RXT-_-R ? The heading is : PI91427: TM1 WEB SHOWS IN BOLD SOME LINES OF A WEBSHEET WHILE IN PERSPECTIVES THOSE LINES ARE NOT IN BOLD ...

And another thing we had to do was to make sure with all the buttons that we set the property "TakeFocusOnClick" to false. We've definitely found Excel 2016 somewhat more "sensitive" shall we say about where it thinks it is and we find we need to be uber-specific about where things are.

Thanks for the push to FP4. We'd been sitting on it but have actually just scheduled it for this week now.

Have not been having the problems with FP2 anyway to be honest - fingers crossed for it's last week!

We're using it successfully and have been since 9.5.1 and now on 10.2.2 FP2. However, we've a simple system, all data goes into one box and is synched to the other one which is to all intents and purposes a read-only site in another territory. It gives us a (warm) backup and speeds up access for the...

Just in case anyone thought I was smoking something odd, we've had our TM1 consultants look at this and they agreed it was something wrong. We explored the files in different formats, xls, xlsx and xlsm, launching from both application folders and file opens. So, it's been logged with IBM for invest...

Hi all Wondering if this rings any bells with anyone ... I'm leaning towards my question being "has there been any recent Microsoft patches to Windows 7 / Office 2013 that have changed VBA behaviour?" We've upgraded to 10.2.2 FP2 from 9.5.1 recently. We had a number of models in our Application Fold...

All three of them, more's the pity. * Cafe for people in far flung places with terrible speed over the WAN, if we can get it working then we should be able to decommission replication too. Challenge is finding time / resource to help users update their reports - testing so far with using Cafe on nat...

Hi, update for you all, thanks for looking. We have now established we do indeed have a production server with slower cores than our staging server. We did some calculations based on IBM's PVUs and the timing differences in the log files so that all seems to stack up. My original concern was that th...

Sorry for the late reply - I only get to look at this forum once a week. The two cfg files are identical (barring server name differences obviously) as they are literally copies of each other. We're on 9.5.1 so I don't think the parameters around multiple threads / persistent feeders or any of that ...

Hi guys, long time lurker, infrequent poster. We've just had two of our server boxes upgraded in anticipation of moving from 9.5.1 32bit to something a bit (more) modern. What's puzzling me at the moment is that one box takes over twice as long to start up as the other (48 vs 21 minutes) -- and the ...

Well two of my top 5 are tracking contacts and also something that tracks reporting performance by our business units.

The other ones are more traditional uses

Not sure if this helps you but here's what I do. Our IT folk don't allow us to monitor RAM on the servers (no login access) and as we're still on 32 bit it's obviously a problem. I've set up a .bat file that runs this line and then I can read the .txt file (as I do have access to the data folder). T...