TM1 Forum

Yes, quite possible. Look here https://exploringtm1.com/sending-emails-from-tm1-part-1/ , or search on the internet. You'll need to have the manager's email addresses stored somewhere, a manager specified per Business Unit and a submission date for each Business Unit (unless it's a standard date for...

Hi Tom,

I don't have a solution for you, I'm afraid, but I'd be interested in your migration to Cloud experience when you have a spare moment, as it's something we're about to embark on.

So, just to hijack this thread for a moment, I'm trying to figure out a way of making comment practical.. As an example, I have a cube with exchange rates, among other dimensions, and users can put a comment (annotation, would be nice if IBM could make up their mind) against any of the exchange rate...

Best to ask on the RushTI github page? https://github.com/cubewise-code/rushti/issues

Or, buy some more memory

You could try NTLM rather than Kerberos.

Unique id should be username@domain; not sure that case makes a difference.

So for maximum performance (in theory) these MTx parameters should be set or T as standard? Even in the case of using Persistent Feeders it's going to show a gain when for some reason they fail/get blown away.

So, apparently this is expected behavior and there's no plan to change it. I'd rather have the Perspectives behavior and no drop-down myself. I'm going to raise an RFE. *sigh*

So an update from support/development: Excel prevents the dropdown from rendering on a protected sheet. This has been the behavior for past releases as well except before the fix for Defect 80174 (it is PI96773), it would prompt on selection. Once a password has been entered, the dropdowns will star...

This is a bug. IBM said it had been fixed in PAX 11.0.33, but it's still there in 11.0.38. I've just (re)raised the defect with IBM.

Have you looked at this thread? http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... tlm#p42908

You might want to get in contact with Azizi Soufiane, who wrote this: https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uplo ... eAzizi.pdf

Did you put the COM add-in back as well?

Good work Paul, I know how much effort it takes to get IBM to this stage. FWIW, I believe we're seeing similar memory issues.

Regards

See http://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=13885

Have you checked both memory and disk space availability on the server?

I believe the answer to this is not yet, as IBM won't let third-party software onto their cloud servers, and I don't think Cubewise have finished converting Pulse to the Rest API. The best people to talk to about this are Cubewise at cubewise.com , who I'm sure will be delighted at the idea of a sal...

Hi Kamil, The only non-vanilla thing is that this is running on Citrix, and the way this is set up I don't have access to the \ssl directory for the Citrix image to add the imbtm1.arm file. It is only Architect/Perspectives for the moment. I tried it on a local copy of TM1 and I had the same issue. ...

Just in case anyone else goes down the same rabbit hole: Step 3 on Kamil's post implies (or at least it did to me) that you don't need to add the ibmtm1.arm file to the local install \ssl directory. Using 10.2 and 10.2.2 it wouldn't work for me unless that file is in the \ssl directory, no matter wh...

So, it's been getting on for 10 years, and I'm looking at replacing my (local) TM1 servers. I get that (mostly) more memory is better and (mostly) more cores are better and (probably) SSD hard drives with lots of headroom are good. Ignoring licensing issues for the purposes of argument, and the deba...