Dumb question, but . . .

Post Reply
jcblough
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:08 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 10.1
Excel Version: 2010

Dumb question, but . . .

Post by jcblough »

What is the difference between '@=' and '='? I cannot find a single thing about them.
ellissj3
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:43 pm
OLAP Product: Cognos TM1
Version: 9.0 - 10.2
Excel Version: 2010

Re: Dumb question, but . . .

Post by ellissj3 »

@= is required when youre conducting a conditional statement to evaluate a string.

For Example:

if (<Current Version> @= 'Plan' );
Then ....
Endif;
jcblough
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:08 pm
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: 10.1
Excel Version: 2010

Re: Dumb question, but . . .

Post by jcblough »

I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!
Alan Kirk
Site Admin
Posts: 6647
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dumb question, but . . .

Post by Alan Kirk »

jcblough wrote:I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!
The multiple documentation files don't make it easy to find anything (especially as the installed help files still have to be searched separately despite Iboglix supposedly "taking onboard" what a bad design that is :evil: ), however this is the kind of question that you'll generally find the answer to in the Reference Guide. That's usually my first point of call for anything syntax related. In the case of this particular question you'll find it under the Comparison Operators in TM1 Rules heading.
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
Alan Kirk
Site Admin
Posts: 6647
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
OLAP Product: TM1
Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Dumb question, but . . .

Post by Alan Kirk »

Alan Kirk wrote:
jcblough wrote:I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!
The multiple documentation files don't make it easy to find anything (especially as the installed help files still have to be searched separately despite Iboglix supposedly "taking onboard" what a bad design that is :evil: )
As an aside, which genius at Iboglix decided to deploy the 10.1 online documentation under an HTTPS protocol instead of the HTTP one that the 9.5 documentatation used? They aren't secured documents, and so the principal "benefit" seems to be that you get an unending series of "Security Warnings" from Internet Explorer asking "Do you want to view only the web page content that was delivered securely? This webpage contains content that will not be delivered using a secure HTTPS connection," (well duh, it's not supposed to be secured) " which could compromise the security of the entire webpage."

Cheers lads, another software architecture triumph for IBM, which really understands how to put a web site together.

(Put HTML code inside a paintball gun and fire it at a wall, is I believe the preferred method.)
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
Post Reply