Dumb question, but . . .
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:08 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.1
- Excel Version: 2010
Dumb question, but . . .
What is the difference between '@=' and '='? I cannot find a single thing about them.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:43 pm
- OLAP Product: Cognos TM1
- Version: 9.0 - 10.2
- Excel Version: 2010
Re: Dumb question, but . . .
@= is required when youre conducting a conditional statement to evaluate a string.
For Example:
if (<Current Version> @= 'Plan' );
Then ....
Endif;
For Example:
if (<Current Version> @= 'Plan' );
Then ....
Endif;
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:08 pm
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: 10.1
- Excel Version: 2010
Re: Dumb question, but . . .
I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6647
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Dumb question, but . . .
The multiple documentation files don't make it easy to find anything (especially as the installed help files still have to be searched separately despite Iboglix supposedly "taking onboard" what a bad design that isjcblough wrote:I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!

"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6647
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 2:30 am
- OLAP Product: TM1
- Version: PA2.0.9.18 Classic NO PAW!
- Excel Version: 2013 and Office 365
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Dumb question, but . . .
As an aside, which genius at Iboglix decided to deploy the 10.1 online documentation under an HTTPS protocol instead of the HTTP one that the 9.5 documentatation used? They aren't secured documents, and so the principal "benefit" seems to be that you get an unending series of "Security Warnings" from Internet Explorer asking "Do you want to view only the web page content that was delivered securely? This webpage contains content that will not be delivered using a secure HTTPS connection," (well duh, it's not supposed to be secured) " which could compromise the security of the entire webpage."Alan Kirk wrote:The multiple documentation files don't make it easy to find anything (especially as the installed help files still have to be searched separately despite Iboglix supposedly "taking onboard" what a bad design that isjcblough wrote:I was thinking that was it, from code context, but was not sure - thanks!)
Cheers lads, another software architecture triumph for IBM, which really understands how to put a web site together.
(Put HTML code inside a paintball gun and fire it at a wall, is I believe the preferred method.)
"To them, equipment failure is terrifying. To me, it’s 'Tuesday.' "
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.
-----------
Before posting, please check the documentation, the FAQ, the Search function and FOR THE LOVE OF GLUB the Request Guidelines.