TM1 Forum

Just a quick update on this one for those on 10.2.20000.50183 (not FP1) This issue has re-surface but appears to have been corrected in 10.2.2 FP1 (10.2.20100.123) I cannot find any mention of the fix in the Fix List but aftert the number of issues on 10.2.2 would encourage everyone to update to FP1...

@Lotsaram - Just to be sure of what I did, this is TM1Web only, not Application which AFAIK only supports modes 1 and 5. We have not needed to use CAM, CAM with LDAP at this stage so cannot comment. I have not needed to configure for multiple domain controllers but have got users on multiple domains...

Here is a guide I created when I configured TM1Web in my lab. Note that I used TM1 10.2.2 FP1, Tomcat etc, bog standard TM1 install for my server components. 1. References Required TM1 Service Account – Used to start TM1 services TM1 Server Name – Machine on which TM1 will be running TM1 Domain Name...

Hi kangkc, Thanks for your reply - I think what was confusing me is the expectation of the Integrated Login tick box, not that I needed to enter credentials. It seemed that the configuration in the KRB5.conf file was incorrect and thus not authenticating. Getting the correct KDC server FQDN is they ...

Thank you for your fast and detailed response Declan, really appreciate it.
I think the biggest concern for me as a developer and as customer would be around the compliance aspect i.e. IFRS and Audit areas.

As I have no experience with Controller, I am hoping to leech some insight from some of you that do. I have a prospect that has TM1 for Budgeting and Forecasting where we are consolidating about 23 companies into roughly 4 areas - three levels of consolidation i.e. Holding Company, Subs, Subs with S...

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... ab_1022FP1 is now showing that PI24861 is fixed in 10.2.2 FP1

This has been one of my frustration over the past months too. Per IBM at http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI16283&myns=apar&mynp=DOCTYPEstatus&mync=E the issues appears to be fixed in 10.2.2 FP1 I have recently upgraded and tested doing the following: 1) Start Excel and ...

Just applied FP1 patch to test this issue - happy to report that TM1 behaves as it used to do. I created a very simplistic example cube with Year, Month and Measures - Measures had Volume, Value, Extended to illustrate the issue. Rules are as follows: SKIPCHECK; ['Volume']=N:IF(['Value']=0,0,CONTINU...

Thanks Declan - Stack Overflow was addressed.

I have note logged anything with IBM yet as I am unsure as to whether or not there is an issue here.

You could also try using SED (command line tool) You need to use notepad to create an input file for SED to process - call it rename.sed for example then enter in s/\OLDNAME/NEWNAME/g I then use a batch file to execute through the various file types: @echo off set currdir=%CD% echo %currdir% for /R ...

Thanks lotsaram - the reason I raised it is that it is the first time we hit on this after an upgrade from 9.4 where it behaved differently. Will keep in mind going forward - seems to be similar rationale to a SUBNM where you can specify an index of say 1 and always return the first element, just as...

For those who are migrating, please note that API declarations need to be updated to declare for 64-bit and 32-bit the below code seems to do the trick: #If Win64 Then Private Declare PtrSafe Function ... #Else Private Declare Function #End If In so far as possible we are changing templates to use A...

TM1 Server 10.2.2 ViewTitleElementSet(CubeName, ViewName, DimName, Index); FYI, do not use this command as it can return incorrect results for any dimension which has element security. It takes as an argument an index to a dimension and it then uses that index to show a specific element. The problem...

Can anyone shed some light on the below messages (google seems to be stumm on these): 4104 [370] DEBUG 2014-09-02 06:12:05.735 TM1.Blob CommitDeferredFileCommand - BLOB_FILE_CLOSE is pending all blob readers to drain out. Any updates will not be fully committed until this happens or the server is sh...

This issue has now been referred to Dev for fixing - APAR PI24861

Placing a C level rule below an N level rule interferes with the N level rules below that C level rule and can lead to data loss. This is in spite of the fact that the parameter AllowSeparateNandCRules is set to T. As an example if there is an element called Volume and the following rule is set it w...

I have been testing in a VM running 2008R2 64-bit, trying to get 10.1 FP1 servers and clients all running on the same box. I went through the install of all the prerequisites and had a successful install. On launching office for the first time I got the tm1xl.ocx file issue. Check all the steps abov...