Thanks Martin.
So with conditional feeders, if the cube I'm feeding is itself, I still would need to use the DB('Cube') function?
Search found 125 matches
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:50 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Left Side Attribute Reference in Feeder?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5563
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:30 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Left Side Attribute Reference in Feeder?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5563
Left Side Attribute Reference in Feeder?
Hello all,
I'd like to be able to limit a source dimension in a feeder based on an attribute, something like:
FEEDERS;
['FY10', 'Pass1', 'Account' with Attribute 'Type' = 'Mapped' ] => ['FY10', 'Pass1', ... etc];
Is this possible?
TIA. - John
I'd like to be able to limit a source dimension in a feeder based on an attribute, something like:
FEEDERS;
['FY10', 'Pass1', 'Account' with Attribute 'Type' = 'Mapped' ] => ['FY10', 'Pass1', ... etc];
Is this possible?
TIA. - John
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:08 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4302
Re: Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
Roger that... Thanks.
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:54 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4302
Re: Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
Thanks... I read somewhere to get your rules working first and then worry about your feeders but it sounds like they are mandatory to ensure consolidations happen correctly.
So is there a catch-all feeder assignment in the case of an element that doesn't have any dependency on another element?
So is there a catch-all feeder assignment in the case of an element that doesn't have any dependency on another element?
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:16 pm
- Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
- Topic: Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4302
Rules Consolidation - Avoiding ConsolidateChildren
Hi, New TM1 (v9.4) user here... I've been pulling my hair out for the last day on the following seemingly simple issue: If I use a rule to assign a value only to "N:" level elements, consolidations of the impacted N-level elements should work without having to utilize a ConsoildateChildren...