TM1 Forum

Well it was discussed at length here https://www.tm1forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=73332&sid=ba5cbd3e85205d0af84de89c32557426#p73332 But I wouldn't call that recently. Well yeah this is my APAR https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/PH24729 ... and according to IBM yes this was closed as "fixed&...

You can only access alternate hierarchies through MDX views not traditional views. At this time drill-through only supports traditional views as the target and not MDX views. You can vote for the RFE to support MDX views in drill-through here https://ibm-data-and-ai.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/PAOC-I-393 No...

Ah, I got it! I should be looping through the second dimension like such... GENERATE(FILTER(TM1FILTERBYLEVEL(TM1SUBSETALL([MMAP Versions]) , 0) , [MMAP Versions].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("Vintage") <> "") , {STRTOMEMBER("[MMAP Vintages].[" + [MMAP Versions].CURRENTMEMB...

Should be possible. But you would need to use the Generate function.

People usually pay me to fix that kind of problem. I feel like every time you have an issue, you post on this forum. Yeah dude seriously no one is going to read through that much code and provide you with a free answer (not even Declan). A circular reference is exactly what the error says it is. Fi...

There are functions which MDX can deliver quite easily which TM1 rules either can't deliver unless you go back to 1st principles algebra (e.g. standard deviation) or where it simply isn't worth writing a separate rule for or for things like min/max/count/average where the relevance of the analysis i...

CDM still works very well with TM1 as a data source. If you think it would be a good solution then suggest it to the client. Whether to accept the extra cost and licensing versus the benefits of the software is their decision not yours.

This looks like you have both element security on the Projects dimension where the users have at least READ access and cell security rules on the cube in question which are giving NONE access to the consolidations in the Projects dimension.

Hi Jorge, I think at some point you hgave transposed some 9s to 6s. Originally you say 4.769999999996 (but from the screenshot it is 4.7700000000999996). But then in a later post you quote 4.7666666669. This number can't be correct and if this is the case the difference (althoug as Wim says only 0.0...

This is simply a floating point issue which doesn't need to be solved, or can be easily "solved" by simply adjusting the precision of the display to 2dp. The difference between 4.77 and 4.769999999996 is at the 12th decimal place, 0.000000000004 or 4E-12. That is the difference is effectiv...

If VMT = 0 then the default value will be used which I believe is 5 seconds. So if the view construct takes less than 5 seconds then nothing will be cached.

This has been discussed many times before. If the client interface is Architect/Perspectives then the only way for servers to not be visible is for them to be registered with a different admin server than the one the client is retrieving the list of instances from.

This has always been the case. You need to use element principal names when using DimensionElementComponentAdd

For this requirement I suggest you have a look at Arc . It does exactly what you describe (click on a chore and see everything about the chore in a separate pane). Of course it does a whole lot of other stuff as well. But the price per user is very small compared to what I imagine the cost of your t...

Just replicated this and yes CodeW produces the correct result. But what the hell is CodeW? It's undocumented. Why does this exist as opposed to the Code function actually producing the correct result?

Yes of course it's possible you just need to develop it.

But what you are proposing sounds like a direct contravention of licensing requirements as this would in effect be a live query of TM1 using a fixed account rather than a personal account.

If you are using GetJavaN to calculate IRR and other financial type iterative functions which are difficult to do natively in TM1 I suggest you have a look at TM1Py CubeCalc

You may also wish to consider alternative options to replace the function long term as it was nearly removed entirely, and I suspect it won't be supported in the next major release. Here's the link: Yes the in process java support is removed entirely in v12 a.k.a next gen server a.k.a planning anal...

What Tom said.

There's not a delay. Private objects are registered when the user logs on. All that is required is that the target user logs out and logs back in.