TM1 Forum

Yes, but I need help with the TI code As is the case for many TI processes, the Prolog tab code contains a zero out of the target cells. Also, the Prolog tab contains the code for creating a view collecting the input cells - those that need to be allocated. After that, the Data tab contains code to...

Hello,

George Tonkin and Edward Stuart have been working on this in the past:
https://community.ibm.com/community/use ... utput-file

Does this help ?

TI will be the better option here.

It’s not very clear to me but hopefully I get it right. The cube on which you have a view, doesn’t it have dimensions year / version / department ? Why would you be creating concatenations of these in another dimension ? I expect to see these 3 dimensions and the }Clients dimension and possibly a fe...

Updated version.

Of you can turn it into a parent-child relation, why not store the parent name in a string value for the child ?

That version is 2 years old, maybe it’s solved in the meantime ?

Yes. You would retrieve the values in the Metadata and/or Data tab of the process. Or use the element attributes cube as the data source.

What I did notice is that I could import a CSV containing 50 PAW users. I am not a Subscription Administrator in that model. The "Send invitation" button is greyed out. Importing users, however, is possible. Maybe that’s why IBM separated it in 2 parts. Someone that is not a Subscription A...

Confirmed. Not really intuitive. Why would someone upload users to PAW and not wanting to invite them ?

In response to the original question, I have a new user base which is entirely on 64 bit Excel and some of them are pining for TM1 Tools so yes, I am working on a 64 bit version but I'm looking at converting over to the Rest API since some of the functionality in the existing one is based on ye old...

As I am not really happy with my solutions in TI and the REST API, I loaded an idea / request for assistance.

https://ibm-data-and-ai.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/PAOC-I-1340

Feel free to give it your vote.

I tried using TM1py and the TM1 REST API to achieve the same result. We all know that the file system and ExecuteCommand will be out soon. The solution suffers from being slow as well as that I cannot retrieve private application entries for a user. Also, impersonation is also out in V12 I think so ...

You can do without a cube. You use alternate hierarchies and use PAfE.

You’re welcome Jim

What you try to do is exactly alternate hierarchies. Do you have PAW and PAfE as well ? It will be much easier. If not, is A through D a real dimension in the cube of data ?

An example output would be useful too ?

Can you show a picture of the dimension ? Only the relevant part and no alias for exanple. Then we see better the element names and what is at play.

How is it set up in the dimension, more precisely, a hierarchy might better suit your purposes although Perspectives is out then and PAfE will be better. Do you have your rollups to aggregate in a cube ?

Updated version below.

Hello all, I am in the last steps of a migration from an on-premise TM1 model to the IBM cloud. The majority of my time was spent changing TI process data sources of Cognos Framework Manager packages to plain text files. "Thank you" IBM for removing the good old TM1 Package Connector :evil...