TM1 Forum

The problem is that the TM1JavaApi jar file uses some IBM JRE specific code. I'm not aware of any workaround that would allow you to use the Oracle JRE instead. I don't know off the top of my head if IBM even supports the use of the TM1JavaApi with the Oracle JRE. If they do you could file a bug. In...

Did you also grab an IF for FP5?

This looks like an issue I've seen where some IBM updates to enforce TLS 1.2 security only work with the IBM JRE and not with the Oracle JRE.

The IBM jre is provided as part of the install kit in the <path_to_install_location>/bin(64)/jre/ folder.

Looking at the fix list I think they only fixed the temporary subsets issue. We still can't use temporary views as data source. If they fixed that too that would be really awesome. I actually asked IBM support about it back then and was told these 2 issues will not be fixed until 10.3... I don't se...

Something like a major error or ProcessQuit/ProcessError call will stop executing the current TI process and with a single commit mode chore no further TI processes will execute.

So if you call ProcessQuit in the 2nd TI of the single commit mode chore, then the 3rd and 4th TI processes will not run.

Once a cell is fed it will remain fed until either the server is restarted or the cube unloaded. Just to add to what qml stated, this applies if you're NOT using PersistentFeeders. If PersistentFeeders are enabled you'd need to both delete the .feeder file(s) AND restart the server to remove fed ce...

Have you tried both the "Allow Spreading" as well as the "Consolidation TypeIn Spreading" capabilities?

I believe "Allow Spreading" is the only capability that can be denied to an admin.

What version of TM1/TM1Web are you running? According that link from IBM, capabilities were added in 10.2.2 FP1. Are you having problems restricting spreading in TM1Web cubeviews, websheets, or both?

LogOutput was introduced in 10.2.2 FP1 which has been out since 2014, so if you have any fixpacks for 10.2.2 you should be able to use this function. If you are running a version of TM1 that has this function, could you provide us with an example of how you're trying to call the function and what yo...

While I haven't heard of this exact problem, is this network storage that's being written to in prod? Theoretically at least the large file write could saturate that network connection and prevent any of those operations you're describing. Maybe IT could check if a direct console login is also froze...

I don't see anything wrong with this code. One note to make is that Synchronized() takes an arbitrary string name, and doesn't require the name of an existing object on the server. While I can reproduce with 10.2.2 FP5, There's a chance this is related to the combination of Lock.Exception logging an...

That's the first time I've heard of the Synchronized() function crashing. It's been my experience that IBM takes crash issues seriously but YMMV.

Just to add to what Alan said - The problem is that when you call RunTI you are creating something which is not part of the chore or set of called processes, as the case may be. Sure, you are calling it from a process BUT RunTI creates its own connection to the server, and then does its own updates....

The page file and all associated paging operations are completely managed by the operating system. That being said, there is a tm1s.cfg parameter (LockPagesInMemory) you can use to get TM1 to instruct windows to never page out memory to disk. This option can make out of memory crashes more likely si...

Yeah, it's a strange issue. While I have no VBA experience, I don't see anything that looks wrong in your code. All the TM1 API calls match what I'd expect to see in the C API. On the other hand, I've seen lines longer than 1024 characters in a TI created in architect which indicates it's not some f...

The only limit I'm aware of is that TM1ValString can only create a string with length less than 65535.

You could always iterate and output PrologLines and hArray to verify they contain the expected data.

Looks like 'Threshold' filtering is unavailable due to a (old) bug in log4cxx https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-28 Since there is a fix available you might be able to file a bug with IBM and push them to apply the fix. As for the other 'Filter' options in log4j/log4cxx being unavailable w...

First, I agree with Tomok. You'll probably be better served by the VBA macros installed with the perspectives or cafe clients. Since you are trying to hardcode credentials into your source, have you looked at using TM1SystemServerConnectWithCAMNamespace instead? The CAM passport can be thought of as...

At a quick glance I'd assume it's because you are sending a single value and not an array containing a single value in the request body. http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS9RXT_10.2.2/com.ibm.swg.ba.cognos.tm1_rest_api.10.2.2.doc/t_tm1_rest_api_cellsets.html%23dg_tm1_odata_update_single_ce...

Have you tried using an appender other than the SharedMemoryAppender? It's not a standard log4cxx appender and might not implement the threshold setting.

Not to be a Debbie Downer, but has behavior been replicated more than once? Since the only document I can find from IBM that makes an attempt at defining IdleConnectionTimeOut states the parameter only applies to idle client connections, I'm a bit skeptical that this has any impact on thread cancell...