Search found 574 matches

by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:01 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Rules: Nested ATTRS()
Replies: 12
Views: 10021

Re: Rules: Nested ATTRS()

Hi Eric,

The DB rule looks OK to me. I wonder though whether the spaces in the name of the '2009 Budget HC' dimension is causing problems.
Maybe replacing !2009 Budget HC with !'2009 Budget HC' will help? (I'm not sure, I never use dimension or cube names with spaces in it).

Michel
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:32 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Rules: Nested ATTRS()
Replies: 12
Views: 10021

Re: Rules: Nested ATTRS()

Hi Eric,

In your rule you mix an internal ( type ['...'] ) reference with a rules function. This is not possible. If you want to apply a function you need to use the external notation ( type DB(cube, ..., '601910', ..., AttrS(...), ...) ).

Michel
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:36 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Consolidation and feeders
Replies: 7
Views: 7563

Re: Consolidation and feeders

Hi, guys I want to be sure of something, If I have a C: element named Income (formed by local, inter and other) this feeder is correct? SKIPCHECK; ['income'] = N: ['discount'] * .15; FEEDERS; ['discount'] => ['income']; is ok? probably i will not have a "not fed", but a C: can feed a N:? ...
by Michel Zijlema
Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:30 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Using 9.1
Replies: 16
Views: 12212

Re: Using 9.1

Alan Kirk wrote:(Oddly named = "Whatever DID happen to 9.2 and 9.3?")
Just guessing: I think this is because your one-but-most-favorite web frontend EV is currently already on version 9.3.
by Michel Zijlema
Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:42 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Mass Element Deletion
Replies: 6
Views: 6361

Re: Mass Element Deletion

Hi George, If you have a dimension that is used in x cubes you can create x processes that use an 'all' view as a source on these cubes. An all view will be a view with all elements selected on all dimensions and with the 'Skip Consolidated' and 'Skip Calculated' flags disabled and the 'Skip Zeroes'...
by Michel Zijlema
Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:38 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Automatic security
Replies: 14
Views: 11469

Re: Automatic security

Hi John,

I remember SPF Plus creating security rules. Could it be SPF Plus is/was running in your environment?

Michel
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:02 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Feeders without Skipcheck
Replies: 7
Views: 7037

Re: Feeders without Skipcheck

No worries. I was confronted with an old model that needs to be revised thoroughly. I was going for a quick win but found I had to go all the way implementing S&F bottom-up in the cascade of interlinked cubes. As writing S&F on all cubes was one of the things on my list it will be my first a...
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:04 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Feeders without Skipcheck
Replies: 7
Views: 7037

Re: Feeders without Skipcheck

Hi Jim, I know how feeders work :ugeek: . The cube with the hashed out Skipcheck statement does not need the Feeders (well, it does from a performance perspective, but that's beside the issue here). This cube is calculating correctly without using Skipcheck/Feeders. The key thing for me was that if ...
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:57 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Feeders without Skipcheck
Replies: 7
Views: 7037

Feeders without Skipcheck

It appears that Feeders in a rulessheet will only be triggered (processed) when in the same rulessheet the Skipcheck is actived. If not, defined (external) Feeders will not work. Yesterday I ran into a situation where I had a cube where the Skipcheck statement was hashed out, but the Feeders stateme...
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:22 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: TM1 64bit and 32bit
Replies: 18
Views: 19260

Re: TM1 64bit and 32bit

Does anyone know whether strings >255 also implies that variables in TI will be able to hold strings >255 chars? This would be good in relation to the ODBCOutput function, where the current limit is really a pain.

Michel
by Michel Zijlema
Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:00 am
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Best Practice: XRate Retreival
Replies: 6
Views: 8908

Re: Best Practice: XRate Retreival

Another option (also commercial, but I think cheaper) is: http://www.oanda.com/channels/business/ ... shtml#data

Michel
by Michel Zijlema
Thu May 22, 2008 2:37 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Mass Element Deletion
Replies: 6
Views: 6361

Re: Mass Element Deletion

You can also Run a list of all Elements and compare them to a list of all elements with Supress Zeors on and the ones that do not have a match are the ones you need to delete. Please note that your method cannot be used when the dimension is used in more than one cube - an element can have data loa...
by Michel Zijlema
Thu May 22, 2008 2:02 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: Mass Element Deletion
Replies: 6
Views: 6361

Re: Mass Element Deletion

Hi Ajay, You could define an attribute 'active' on the regarding dimension and setup processes that run through an all view on the cubes using the dimension, where the processes mark the 'active' attribute when there is value loaded. After this you can run a process that deletes all elements where t...
by Michel Zijlema
Thu May 22, 2008 1:04 pm
Forum: IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW
Topic: TM1 n00b question - installation
Replies: 4
Views: 5544

Re: TM1 n00b question - installation

Hi Dave,

This is a regular setup, so this should work.
Shame about missing the train wreck though..

Michel