TM1 Forum

Hello All,
Just wanted to keep all posted that the issue described in thread is a known defect in TM1 10.2.2 with APAR ID PI95740. This is resolved in 10.2.2 FP7 IF10 and up.

We just ran IF16 that's the latest one and the issue got resolved.

Thanks
Anubha

Hello RSK & Paul , Can someone please shed some light on how this issue got resolved . we are in a similar fix when the editable cell (simple by type) accepts any other value than zero . It accepts any value but not zero hence client is getting trouble in making that cell zero if needed. Any ide...

In Tm1 10.2 , Can someone please elaborate on known impacts of adding annotations using attachments or comments on the performance of the Tm1 Web Applications in terms of slowness in opening nodes or higher loading time of workflow page. Please share best practices regarding this new feature - that ...

Thank you Guys for sharing knowledge & your valued expertise on this thread. Really appreciated. We are figuring out the right balance between Cell & Element security to ensure that the auto generated rules are not touched - however supplementing to the auto security would be the best approa...

Hello Everyone We are in the final stages of upgrading from TM1 9.5.2 to TM1 10.2 and running into issues with Cell Security Rules. The model originally had Cell Security rules which were working fine but that combined with the new Auto Generated Cell Security Rules in 10.2, things are not working a...